SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Ori) 70

PANIGRAHI
MUHAMMAD KHAN – Appellant
Versus
GOURISHANKAR MISRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.MOHANTY, P.C.CHATTERJI

PANIGRAHI, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision directed against an order of acquittal passed by the Sessions judge, Sambalpur, in an appeal against the conviction of the opposite party, Gouri shankar Misra, who is said to be a Pleader of Sambalpur. The facts giving rise to this petition are that the opposite party filed Money Suit No. 213 of 1936 in the court of the Munsiff, Sambalpur, on the foot of a money-bond, Ext. A-1, dated 226-32, against one Kruttibas Naik who is said to be his maternal uncle. The debt was originally contracted by Kruttibas Naik and his brother from the father of the opposite party. One of the debtors paid up his share of the debt and for the share of Kruttibas a fresh bond was taken in the name of the opposite party. The bond recites :

"prom your father, I and my brother had incurred a loan of Rs. 500/- by executing a bond, towards the interest of which we had paid Rs. 120/ -. Rs. 366/- is the share payable by me, being half of the total dues thereunder. As the dues under that bond have fallen to your share and as I am unable to repay the same, I execute this bond acknowledging my liability to pay Rs. 366/ -. I stipulate to pay you within one year the amount w







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top