SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Ori) 55

DAS
ABHINA SAHU – Appellant
Versus
DAITARI SAHU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.MOHANTY, R.N.MISRA

DAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application in revision by the defendant against the decision of the small Cause Court Judge, Cuttack, holding on a preliminary issue that the widow-plaintiff is entitled to bring the suit along with other plaintiffs, and accordingly the suit is maintainable. The plaintiff's suit is based upon a pro-note executed in favour of one deceased Saratha Sahu who is the husband of plaintiff 2 and father of plaintiff 1 and uncle of plaintiff 3. The dclence of the defendant-petitioner was that the suit by the widow-plaintiff is not maintainable in the absence of a succession certificate as provided under section 214 of the Indian Succession Act. The learned Small Cause Court Judge held relying upon a decision of this Court reported in Ganga-dhar Raut v. Subhashiiri Bewa, (S) AIR 1955 Orissa 135 (A), to the effect that the devolution ol an estate on the Hindu widow under Section 3 (2) of the Hindu Women's Rights to property Act is neither by survivorship, nor by inheritance, but is a special right created in favour of the widow by the special Statute. In that decision of this court, their Lordships did not follow the view of the Patna High Court reported in kedar Nat










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top