SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Ori) 106

G.C.DAS
SUBUDHI PADHAN – Appellant
Versus
RAGHU BHUVAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.G.Panda, P.V.B.RAO, S.K.Panda

G. C. DAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the sole plaintiff against the judgment of the learned additional District Judge of Ganjam dismissing his suit.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to the present appeal are these: Plaintiff commenced an action for ejectment of the defendant from the disputed house situated at village sandhamara. According to the plaintiff the suit-house constituted his ancestral property and that at a family partition in 1949, one third share therein was allotted to him, and the remaining two-thirds share was allotted to his two uncles, arjun and Kandha. Plaintiff purchased the share of his two uncles on 19-12-1950 under two sale deeds Exts. 1 and 2. Thus, he became the sole owner of the entire property. The defendant who is the son-in-law of a sister of the plaintiff's uncle, arjun Padhan is said to have occupied the back portion of the house in February 1947, with the permission of Arjun who was at the time manager of the plaintiff's family. After the acquisition of the right of the entire house, the plaintiff asked the defendant to vacate the portion occupied by him but the defendant instead of vacating the back portion which was in his occupation in December












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top