SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Ori) 73

S.BARMAN, G.K.MISRA
DUKHI DEI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.P.Kar

MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant has been convicted under Section 302, I. P. C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life. She was also convicted under Section 392 read with Section 397, Indian Penal Code, but no separate sentence was passed.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case may be stated in short. Basanti, the deceased, was married to Baruna Giri of village Mangalpur in her child-hood. After she attained puberty, her husband wanted to marry an educated girl and refused to accept her. A punchayati held over the matter produced no effect on the husband and his father. The deceased was, however, very anxious to join her husband. The accused is a resident of Keonjhar town. On 20-7-63 she went to the house of jogeswar Baidya (P. W. 17) the brother of Daina (P. W. 6 ). She stayed there for two days and came to the house of P. W. 6 who is the aunt of the deceased, on 1-863. She falsely introduced herself as the Fulla (god-friend) of P. W, 6. Daina could not recognise her. The accused created confidence in P. W. 6 by giving out the name of her brother (P. W. 17 ). P. W. 6 and the parents of Basant have one common compound. During her stay with P. W. 6, the accused had secret conversation with the d

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top