SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Ori) 5

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
R. L. Narasimham, C. J. And S. Barman, J.
PADMA CHARAN MOHAPATRA - Appellant
Versus
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CUM TAXING AUTHORITY OF PHULBANI - Respondent
O. J. C.  273  Of  1963
Decided On : JANUARY 08, 1964

Advocates Appeared:
R.C.PATNAIK, R.N.MISRA

The phrase 'within 15 days' in Section 12-A (1) of the Bihar and Orissa Motor Vehicles Act means 15 clear days, excluding the due date of payment.

Headnote:

Penalty - Bihar and Orissa Motor Vehicles Act - Interpretation of 'within 15 days' provision

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged a penalty imposed for not paying vehicle tax within 15 days of the due date, as per Section 12-A of the Bihar and Orissa Motor Vehicles Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the expression 'within 15 days' in Section 12-A (1) of the Act means 15 clear days, excluding the due date of payment. As the tax was paid within 15 clear days, the penalty was set aside.

Issues: Interpretation of the phrase 'within 15 days' in Section 12-A (1) of the Act

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on previous decisions to interpret the phrase 'within a month' as excluding the date on which the order was passed, and applied the same reasoning to the phrase 'within 15 days'.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the order imposing the penalty was set aside.

NARASIMHAM, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition by the owner of a transport vehicle ORS. 2392 against an order under Section 12-A of the Bihar and Orissa Motor Vehicles Act as amended by Orissa (Act XXIII of 1962) levying a penalty of twice the amount of the tax on the petitioner on the ground that he did not pay the tax due on the said vehicle within the period of 15 days from the due date of payment. The order was passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police who has stated in his order that the due date of payment of the tax in respect of the said vehicle was 10-10-1962 and that the tax was actually paid only on 25-10-62. He however held that under Section 12-A of the said Act the period of 15 days would end by 24-10-1962 and that consequently there was a delay of one day.

( 2 ) THE question for consideration is whether the words "within 15 days from the due date of payment" occurring in Section 12-A (1) of the said Act would include the day on which the tax became due or would mean 15 clear days excluding that day. This point is concluded by a Division Bench decision of this Court reported in markanda Sahu v. Lal Sadananda Singh, AIR 1952 Orissa 279 where it was held that the words "within a month" should ordinarily be construed as excluding the date on which the order was passed and would mean an interval of one clear month. The same view has been taken in Bardi Nath v. State of Pepsu, AIR 1957 pepsu 14. Following these two decisions we must hold that the expression "within 15 days" in Section 12a (1) of the Act means 15 clear days which would necessarily exclude the due date of payment. Here, therefore, 10-10-1962 must be excluded and then the payment of the tax made on 25-10-1962 would be within 15 days for the purpose of the said section. Hence the D. I. G. of Police had no jurisdiction to impose penalty. The petition is allowed and the order of the D. I. G. of Police in Motor Vehicles Appeal No. 1 of 1963 levying penalty on the petitioner is set aside. There will be no order for costs.

( 3 ) BARMAN, J. : I agree.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top