SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Ori) 15

R.L.NARASIMHAM
NALU SAHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Y.S.N.MURTY

NARASIMHAM, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 561-A, Cr. P. C. for a review and modification of sentence passed on the two petitioners by this Court in Criminal revision No. 165 of 1963 by the judgment dated 6th September, 1963.

( 2 ) THE two petitioners were tried for an offence under Section 380 and 454 I. P. C. for housebreaking and theft of some ornaments and cash from the house of a prostitute named Adiguni (P. W. 1) in Ganjam district. The trying Magistrate, by his judgment dated 31st March 1962 sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one-year each, on each count, and also directed that the sentences should run consecutively. On appeal, the learned Sessions Judge of berhampur by his judgment dated 22nd March 1963, maintained the conviction and sentence but directed that the sentences should run concurrently. The petitioners then preferred a Criminal Revision (Cr. Revision No. 265 of 1963)before this Court, which disposed of it on merits, by its judgment dated 6th september 1963. The High Court maintained the conviction of the two petitioners but further reduced the sentences to six months each (the sentences to run concurrently ). This Court furth
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top