SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Pat) 157

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD
Baijnath Kurmi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Raj Kishore Prasad, J.

1. This is an application, under Sec.397(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, hereinafter referred to as "the Code", by Baijnath Kurmi and Nagina Dusadh, praying that their sentences of seven years rigorous imprisonment passed separately at two separate trials, be made to run concurrently.

2. This application arises in the following circumstances: As a result of a search on the 18th November, 1957, these petitioners, along with others, with whom we are not concerned here, were put on trial at two separate trials.

3. The first trial, which was for offences under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code, was held by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Arrah, who convicted these two petitioners on the 22nd January, 1959, under both the sections and passed a sentence of seven years rigorous imprisonment on each of them under Sec.399 of the Indian Penal Code, but passed no separate sentence under Sec. 402 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. The second trial was held by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Sasaram, at which these two peti- tioners were put on trial for offences under Sections 19(i) and 20 of the Arms Act At this second trial, the petitioners were convicted










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top