SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Ori) 9

R.K.DASH, C.K.MISRA
AMULYA PATNAIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.G.DAS

MISRA, J.

( 1 ) LATE Padmacharan Patnaik, a literate constable, was undergoing A. S. I. training ib the Police Training College at Angul On 29-11-59 he with other trainees and staff proceeded to Dhenkanal Jail on duty in a police van (ORD 426) belonging to the State Government. The van was being driven by driver Sayad Yakub AM, who was an employee of the State (defendant ). On its way the van dashed against a tree on the road side. Padmacharan sustained injuries and died. Plaintiff is the widow of late Padmacharan. She claimed damages of Rs. 20,000/- on account of the loss caused by the death of her husband as a result of the accident occasioned by rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of the defendant. At the time of his death, late Padmacharan was drawing a monthly salary of Rs. 60/ -. He was 27 years old, was maintaining a very good health and was normally expected to live upto the 60th year with con-sequential promotions due in the police service. The facts leading to the death of Padmacharan are not denied. Defence case is that the death was the result of a pure accident over which the driver had no control and the State was not vicariously liable for the injur









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top