SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Ori) 30

R.K.DASH, G.K.MISRA
BOLANI ORES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA REPRESENTED BY THE COLLECTOR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Basu, P.PARIDA, S.MOHANTY

DAS, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise out of two suits filed by the plaintiffs for declaration that the machineries in their possession, and as described in Schedule A of the plaint, are not liable for registration under Section 22 of the Indian Motor Vehicles act (hereinafter described as the Act') and as such cannot be taxed under Section 6 of the Bihar and Orissa Motor Vehicles Taxation Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'taxation Act') as they do not come within the ambit of the definition of 'motor vehicles' given in Section 2 (18) of the said Act. As both the appeals raise common questions of law they were heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment. First Appeal No. 44 of 1963. The machineries in respect of which the plaintiff seeks a declaration as aforesaid are:

(1) 2 Cu Yd. Lorain Shovels. . . two Nos. (2) Ingersoll-Rand Drill Master. . . two Nos. (3) Caterpiller D-8 Bull-dozers. . . two Nos. (4) Le Tourneau Rockers. . . two Nos. (5) Euclid Dumpers. . . five Nos. (6) Motor Grader. . . one No. (7) Fordson Major Tractors. . . four Nos. (8) Fargo Truck fitted withserving tank for diesel oil, greasing and lubrication unit, oxygen acteylene cutting equipment a




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top