SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Ori) 51

A.MISRA
BHISMADEV TARIA – Appellant
Versus
RADHAKISHAN AGARWALLA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.PAL, N.V.RAMDAS, R.C.MISRA

A. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) DEFENDANTS Nos. 2 and 3 have preferred this appeal against a confirming judgment, One Habibulla Khan was the admitted owner of the suit property. Defendants Nos. 4 to 11 are the descendants of Habibulla. Habibulla entered into an agreement dated 19-5-1947 (Ext. D) with defendant No. 1 to sell the suit property for Rs. 4,300 and received an advance of Rs. 100, but before execution of the sale deed and receipt of the balance of the consideration, he died in June, 1948. Defendants Nos. 4 to 11, his heirs served a notice (Ext. A) on defendant No. 1 on 30-9-48 offering to execute the sale deed on payment of the balance of the consideration within seven days. Defendant No. 1 by his reply (Ext. A/1) claimed that he had advanced Rs. 1,400 to habibulla and expressed his willingness to pay the balance of the consideration on execution of the sale deed. Ultimately defendant No. 4 for self and as guardian of defendants Nos. 6 and 7 and defendant No. 5 for self and as guardian of defendants Nos. 8 to 11 sold the suit property to the plaintiff by a registered sale deed (Ext. 3) on 10-11-48 for a consideration of Rs. 4,000. Defendants Nos. 2 and 3 are sons of defendant No. 1.









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top