SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Ori) 82

B.K.RAY, R.N.MISRA
BASUDEV KHADANGA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.Ananda Rao Dora, G.RATH, R.C.PRADHAN, R.K.Patra

R. N. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) JAGANATH Prasad is one of the 140 Constituencies of the Orissa Legislative assembly. The petitioner a resident of a village in Buguda P. S. covered by the said constituency filed his nomination for election to the Orissa State Legislative assembly in the mid-term poll held in 1971. His nomination paper was however, not accepted on the ground that it was a reserved Constituency for Scheduled castes. The election was duly held end opposite party No. 7 was returned from the constituency. By this application, the petitioner challenges the reservation of the constituency for Scheduled Castes and consequently impugns the election of opposite party No. 7.

( 2 ) OF the several opposite parties, the Returning Officer -- opposite party No. 5, and the returned candidate --opposite party No. 7 -- have filed counter affidavit. The Union of India -- opposite party No. 1 --has entered appearance through counsel and has advanced arguments against the contentions raised in the writ petition though no counter affidavit has been filed.

( 3 ) THERE is no dispute that the Jaganath Prasad Constituency of the Orissa legislative Assembly is a reserved one for Scheduled Castes. The



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top