SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(SC) 69

M. PATANJALI SASTRI, B. K. MUKHERJEE, GHULAM HASAN, S. R. DASS, N. H. BHAGWATI
Nain Sukh Das – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
C.P.LAL, JAI PRASAD AGRAWAL, K.B.ASTHANA, R.PATTANAIK, S.C.ISAACS, S.P.SINHA

Judgement

 Patanjali Sastri, C.J.I.

This is an application under Art. 32 of the Constitution seeking protection of the petitioner s fundamental right under Art. 15 (1) against alleged violation thereof by the respondents.

2. The petitioners are three residents of Etah in Uttar Pradesh. They complain that at the by-elections to the Municipal Board of Etah held on 2-11-1951, 8-12-1951 and 17-3-1952, at which respondents 4, 11 and12 were respectively elected, the petitioners were deprived of their rights to exercise their votes and to seek their election as candidates, as those by-elections were held on communal lines on the basis of separate electorates contrary to the provisions of the Constitution. They also allege that the nomination of respondent 3 as a member of the Board by the Government was an illegal exercise of its powers, as the interest which that respondent was nominated to represent in the Board was already sufficiently represented. The petitioners accordingly pray for the issue of writs of quo waranto , mandamus and other appropriate writs or directions to respondents, 3, 4, 11 and 12 to show under what authority they are acting as members of the Board and to prevent t









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top