M. PATANJALI SASTRI, B. K. MUKHERJEE, GHULAM HASAN, S. R. DASS, N. H. BHAGWATI
Nain Sukh Das – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
Judgement
Patanjali Sastri, C.J.I.
This is an application under Art. 32 of the Constitution seeking protection of the petitioner s fundamental right under Art. 15 (1) against alleged violation thereof by the respondents.
2. The petitioners are three residents of Etah in Uttar Pradesh. They complain that at the by-elections to the Municipal Board of Etah held on 2-11-1951, 8-12-1951 and 17-3-1952, at which respondents 4, 11 and12 were respectively elected, the petitioners were deprived of their rights to exercise their votes and to seek their election as candidates, as those by-elections were held on communal lines on the basis of separate electorates contrary to the provisions of the Constitution. They also allege that the nomination of respondent 3 as a member of the Board by the Government was an illegal exercise of its powers, as the interest which that respondent was nominated to represent in the Board was already sufficiently represented. The petitioners accordingly pray for the issue of writs of quo waranto , mandamus and other appropriate writs or directions to respondents, 3, 4, 11 and 12 to show under what authority they are acting as members of the Board and to prevent t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.