G.B.PATTANAIK, A.K.PADHI
GOPAL BARIHA – Appellant
Versus
SATYANARAYAN DAS – Respondent
A. K. PADHI, J.
( 1 ) THE petitioner, a member of Scheduled Tribe assails the order of the revisional authority arising out of a proceeding under S. 23 of the Orissa Land Reforms Act (hereinafter referred as 'the O. L. R. Act' ).
( 2 ) THE opposite party No. 2 is a member of Scheduled Tribe had purchased the disputed property comprising of an area of A. O. 22 dec. of land in village Padhel on 25-8-1975. According to the petitioner, though the sale deed stands in the name of opposite party No. 2, the real transferee was opposite party No. 1 who belongs to a non-Scheduled Tribe. On these allegations a petition was filed under S. 23 of the O. L. R. Act praying for restoration of possession.
( 3 ) THE opposite parties 1and 2 appeared and according to them opposite party No. 2 was the real purchaser and the transfer being from one Scheduled Tribe member to another Scheduled Tribe member, no permission was required before such transfer.
( 4 ) ON enquiry, the learned Revenue Officer held that the real transferee was opposite party No. 1 and to play fraud on the prohibition under S. 22 of the O. L. R. Act, the sale deed had been executed in favour of opposite party No. 2 and this order
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.