SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ori) 27

R.K.PATRA
BRAJABANDHU PANDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.R.TRIPATHY, Pradipta Mohanty

R. K. PATRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under section 36-B of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the Actt) read with sub-section (2) of section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in brief TCr. P. C. T) against the conviction of the appellant under section 18 of the Act who has been sentenced thereunder to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of one lakh rupees in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for further period of two years.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case mar be briefly unfolded. On 21. 4. 1990 the Inspector of Excise, Purl Sadar (P. W. 6) along with his staff which included P. W. 1 Sub-Inspector of Excise and P. W. 2 Excise constable had been to Sakhigopal area on detection duty. One Magistrate examined as P. W. 6 had accompanied them along with some A. P. R. force. While returning to the headquarters, they halted for sometime on the way at Chandanpur to take betel etc. During their halt, P. W. 2 (Excise Constable) was informed about the traffic of opium by the appellant and this information was conveyed by P. W. 2 to P. W. 5 who immediately with his staff and the Magistrate proceeded tow










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top