SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ori) 214

High Court Of Orissa
ARIJIT PASAYAT, P. C. NAIK
PADMANAV DEHURY - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA - Respondent
O. J. C.  4327  Of  1998
Decided On : 11/08/1998

Advocates Appeared:
M.M.SENAPATI

The nomination of a person as President of the Governing Body of an educational institution should be made on the basis of merit and in the interest of the institution.

Headnote:

EDUCATION - NOMINATION OF PRESIDENT OF GOVERNING BODY - EMINENT EDUCATIONIST - INTERPRETATION OF RULE 27 OF ORISSA EDUCATION (ESTABLISHMENT, RECOGNITION, MANAGEMENT OF PRIVATE JUNIOR COLLEGES/HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOLS) RULES, 1991 - COURT'S ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION - RATIO DECIDENDI - FINAL DECISION

Fact of the Case:

Challenge to the nomination of Ramachandra Mohapatra as President of the Governing Body of Ramamani Mahavidyalaya, Kantabad, Khurda, under Rule 27 of the Orissa Education (Establishment, Recognition, Management of Private Junior Colleges/Higher Secondary Schools) Rules, 1991, on the ground that he is not an eminent educationist.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the nomination of Ramachandra Mohapatra as President of the Governing Body was not in the interest of the institution, as all relevant aspects were not considered by the authorities. The Court found that there was no material and/or discussion in the file to show on what basis the Minister concluded that the persons named in the order were persons interested in the field of education.

Issues: 1. Whether Ramachandra Mohapatra is an eminent educationist as required under Rule 27 of the Orissa Education (Establishment, Recognition, Management of Private Junior Colleges/Higher Secondary Schools) Rules, 1991? 2. Whether the nomination of Ramachandra Mohapatra as President of the Governing Body was in the interest of the institution?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court interpreted Rule 27 of the Orissa Education (Establishment, Recognition, Management of Private Junior Colleges/Higher Secondary Schools) Rules, 1991, and held that the expression 'eminent educationist' means a person who is skilled in the methods of education and teaching, and one who promotes education. 2. The Court held that the nomination of Ramachandra Mohapatra as President of the Governing Body was not in the interest of the institution, as all relevant aspects were not considered by the authorities. The Court found that there was no material and/or discussion in the file to show on what basis the Minister concluded that the persons named in the order were persons interested in the field of education.

Final Decision: The Court quashed the order dated 21-11-1997 by which Rama Chandra was nominated as President of the Governing Body of Ramamani Mahavidyalaya, Kantabad, Khurda.

PASAYAT, J.

( 1 ) NOMINATION of Ramachandra Mohapatra as President of the Governing Body of Ramamani Mahavidyalaya, Kantabad in the district of Khurda is under challenge in this writ application. Said nomination was made by the Director of Higher Education, Orissa, Bhubaneswar under Rule 27 (wrongly stated to be Section 27 in Annexure-1) of the Orissa Education (Establishment, Recognition, Management of Private Junior Colleges/higher Secondary Schools) Rules, 1991 (in short, the 'rules' ). The institution is an aided educational institution within the meaning of Section 3 (b) of the Orissa Education Act, 1969 (in short, the 'act' ).

( 2 ) MAIN plank of challenge is that said Rama Chandra Mohapatra is not an eminent educationist which is a sine qua non for such nomination. It is highlighted that originally by order dated 4-9-1997 (Annexure-1) the Sub-Collector, Khurda was nominated by the Government as the President of the Governing Body. Subsequently by order dated 21-11-1997 (Annexure 2), the impugned order nomination of Rama Chandra was approved by the Director. The Sub-Collector was approved as the Member of the Governing Body.

( 3 ) A brief history of the power relating to such nomination needs to be noted. The fore-runner of the present Rules was The Orissa Education (Management of Private Colleges) Rules, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as the 'old Rules' ). Sub-rule (3) of Rule 3 of the said Rules held the field so far as nomination is concerned. The requirement then was 'person interested in the field of education'. Subsequently it was substituted by the expression 'eminent educationist'. The expression 'eminent educationist' has not been defined. An Educationist is 'one who is skilled in the methods of education and teaching', and 'one who promotes education'. The expression had come up for consideration in several cases before this Court, and it was felt that neither it is easy to explain nor to conceive. It was observed in OJC nos. 3130 and 3359 of 1992 (Mardaraj Mohan Senapati v. State and Ashok Kumar Sahoo v. State) disposed of on 1-3-1993, that the rule making authority can consider whether the expression 'eminent educationist' needs any definition or elucidation. It is interesting to note that originally in the old Rules the requirement was 'person interested'. From 1991 till 1997 the requirement was 'an eminent educationist', and thereafter again from June, 1997 the expression 'person interested' has been substituted by notification dated 28-6-1997 of the Department of Higher Education vide S. R. O. No. 326/97 published in the Orissa Gazette (Extraordinary) dated 30-6-1997. The relevant rule reads as follows :"27. Governing Body of Aided Higher Secondary School (Junior College) - (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in these Rules as soon as a Junior College/private Higher Secondary School becomes an aided one the Governing Body shall be reconstituted in the following manner : (i) The Collector/additional District Magistrate/sub-Collector of the District/sub-division in which the college is situated shall be ex officio President of the Governing Body and the Principal of the College or the teacher in-charge of the Principal shall be its ex officio Secretary :provided that Government may nominate any eminent educationist to be the President who shall continue as such during the pleasure of the Government. In such cases Collector/additional district Magistrate/sub-Collector shall be a member :provided further that in case of a college established and managed by a Trust, Government shall appoint a nominee of the Trust as President of the Governing Body and in such cases the Collector/additional District Magistrate/sub-Collector shall be a manner of the Governing Body. (ii) Two senior-most teachers of the college, local M. L. A. , Chairman, Panchayat Samiti/municipality/notified Area, as the case may be, in which the college is situated shall be the ex officio members. (iii) The Member of Parliament of the const























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top