SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ori) 200

P.C.NAIK, P.K.MOHANTY
MAYADHAR MALLIK – Appellant
Versus
LAXMI MALLIK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.R.DAS, B.K.SAHOO, K.M.Mishra, L.UDGATA, N.LENKA, S.CHAUDHARY

P. K. MOHANTY, J.

( 1 ) THE impugned order of the learned Sub-Judge, Jajpur refusing to transfer the proceeding to Family Court, confirmed by the learned Additional District Judge, is under challenge in this writ petition.

( 2 ) THE short fact of the case is that a suit for maintenance had been instituted by opp. parties 1 to 8, which was registered as T. M. S. No. 49 of 1987 in the Court of learned Subordinate Judge, Jajpur. The suit was decreed against the petitioner on 21-12-1989 directing him to make the payments towards maintenance. The petitioner having failed to make the payments is terms of the decree, the decree-holder (opp. parties 1 to 8) filed Execution Case, registered as Execution Case No. 7 of 1990 before the said Court of Subordinate Judge, Jajpur. The present petitioner-judgment-debtor filed a petition for transfer of the execution case from the Court of Subordinate Judge, Jajpur to the Family Court after establishment of the Family Court, Cuttack. The Subordinate Judge, on consideration held that the Civil Court alone can execute the decree. The petitioner carried a Civil Revision against the said order, which was rejected and the order passed by the Executing C
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top