SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Ori) 246

A.S.NAIDU
VUNDAVILLI VENKATARAJU – Appellant
Versus
KORA LAXMAN RAO – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
U.K.Lenka

A. S. NAIDU, J.

( 1 ) THIS Misc. Appeal has been filed under O. 43, R. 1 (u) of the Code of Civil Procedure inter alia challenging the judgment passed in Money Appeal No. 3/1 of 1985/87 by the Addl. District Judge, Bargarh. Learned lower appellate Court set aside the judgment and decree passed in Money Suit No. 10 of 1983 and remanded the suit under O. 23, R. 23, C. P. C. for fresh disposal after affording opportunity to the plaintiff to file succession certificate within a time as would be just and reasonable. For appreciating the case, some of the facts are necessary to be discussed.

( 2 ) ADMITTEDLY, defendant No. 1-appellant took a loan of Rs. 9,601. 00 from the father of the plaintiff (R-1) and pro forma defendants 2 and 3 by executing a pro-note on 19/02/1980. On Fe 11/02/1983 the father of the plaintiff and pro forma defendants 2 and 3, Kora Surna, expired leaving behind the plaintiff and pro-forma defendants 2 and 3 as his sole survivors and legal heirs. Thereafter a notice was issued calling upon defendant No. 1 to repay the loan. As defendant No. 1 failed to do so, Money Suit No. 10 of 1983 was filed in the Court of the then Subordinate Judge, Bargarh for realisation of







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top