SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Ori) 206

P.K.MOHANTY
PABITRA MOHAN PRADHAN – Appellant
Versus
DAMAYANTI PRADHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K.SAHU, S.C.GHOSH

PRADIP MOHANTY J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners have filed this revision challenging the order dated 10-9-2001 passed by the learned additional District Judge, Angul, in Misc. Appeal No. 8 of 2001, setting aside the order dated 1-3-2001 of the learned Civil judge (Sr. Divn.), Athamallik, in Succession misc. Case No. 1 of 2000 and also Demanding the case to the trial Court for determination as to whether the petitioner-wife alone in the Court below is entitled to get the succession certificate.

( 2 ) SHORN of unnecessary details, the brief facts of the case are as follows : the two petitioners in the present civil revision are the son and daughter and the opposite party is the wife of Late Srinibas pradhan respectively for grant of a succession certificate. The opposite party filed an application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) before the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), athamallik for grant of succession certificate to receive family pension, general-provident fund and dues payable to late Srinibas pradhan, alleged to be the deceased husband. In the said application, the opposite party has narrated that deceased Srinibas pradhan died on










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top