L.MOHAPATRA
BRAHMIN NIJOG – Appellant
Versus
BADU NIJOG – Respondent
L. MOHAPATRA, J.
( 1 ) ALL three appeals have been filed against a reversing judgment. In second Appeal No. 260 of 2002 the appellant and the respondent No. 10 are the plaintiffs who had filed Title Suit No. 166/91 (1) subsequently re-numbered as Title Suit No. 262/95. Respondents Nos. 7 and 8 in Second Appeal No. 255/2002 who are appellants in Second Appeal No. 268/2002 had filed Title Suit No. 314/91 in the Court of the learned Sub-Judge, Bhubaneswar. Title Suit No. 166/91 by order of this Court was transferred to the Court of the Subjudge, Bhubaneswar to be heard along with title Suit No. 314/91 in Civil Revision No. 272/92 and accordingly the said suit was re-numbered as Title Suit No. 262/95 in the court of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhubaneswar. Both the suits were heard together and in a common judgment the suits were decreed in part. Challenging the same defendant Badu Nijog filed two Title appeals and both the appeals having been allowed in a common judgment the aforesaid three Second Appeals have been filed.
( 2 ) TITLE, Suit No. 166/91 (subsequently re-numbered as Title Suit No. 262/95) had been filed in a representative capacity on behalf of Brahmana Ni
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.