SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Ori) 69

P.K.MOHANTY
CHANDRASEKHAR PATEL – Appellant
Versus
UKIABATI PATEL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.V.Ramdas, S.C.MOHAPATRA, SANKARSAN RATH

P. K. MOHANTI, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision arises in the following circumstances:

( 2 ) OPPOSITE party No. 1 is the first wife and opposite parties 2 and 3 are the minor daughters of the petitioner. The opposite parties filed Title Suit No. 64 of 1969 in the court of the Subordinate Judge, Sambalpur claiming future and past maintenance at the rate of Rs. 160/-per month (Rs. 100/- for opposite party no. 1 and Rs. 60/- for opposite parties 2 and 3 ). They also claimed that the immovable properties described in Schedule A of the plaint should foe charged for realisation of the decretal dues. The suit was compromised on the terms that all the movable and immovable properties of the defendant-petitioner should be divided into four equal shares. The defendant and his mother together would take one share, his second wife Padmavati one share, his son radheshyam Patel one share and the plaintiff No. 1 the remaining share to which she would have full title in lieu of her claim for future maintenance. It was also agreed between the parties that within two and half months from the date of compromise the movable and immovable properties of the defendant would be divided and the costs of regis















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top