High Court Of Orissa
PRESENT: Mr. JUSTICE B. P. DAS Mr. JUSTICE A. K. SAMANTRAY
NIRMALA NAYAK - Appellant
Versus
GRID CORPORATION OF ORISSA LTD. - Respondent
O. J. C. 6339 Of 1997
Decided On : 05/11/2005
Electrocution - Compensation Claim - Electricity Act, 1948 - Rules - Strict Liability - Foreseeable Risk - Negligence - Writ Petition Maintainability
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners filed a writ petition claiming compensation for the death of the deceased due to electrocution. The opposite parties disclaimed liability, citing the circumstances of the accident and the lack of negligence on their part. The petitioners argued that the opposite parties were negligent in preventing the escape of dangerous energy, leading to the death of the deceased.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the writ petition was maintainable and held the opposite parties liable on the principle of strict liability to pay compensation to the petitioners. The court awarded compensation of Rs. 1,25,000 to petitioner No. 1 with simple interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from the date of death of the victim till payment.
Issues: The issues involved the negligence of the opposite parties in preventing the escape of dangerous energy, the maintainability of the writ petition, and the determination of compensation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principle of strict liability, emphasizing the foreseeable risk inherent in the nature of the activity. It also considered the maintainability of the writ petition and the determination of compensation based on previous court decisions and legal principles.
Final Decision: The court partly allowed the writ petition and held the opposite parties liable to pay compensation of Rs. 1,25,000 to petitioner No. 1 with simple interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from the date of death of the victim till payment.
A. K. SAMANTRAY, J.
( 1 ) THE petitioners in this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India have claimed compensation from the opposite parties for death of the deceased Rabindlra nayak due to electrocution.
( 2 ) THE petitioner No. 1 is the wife and petitioner Nos. 2, 3 and 4 are the minor daughters and son of the said deceased rabindra Nayak who had electrocution death on 30. 3. 1997 at pre-dawn hour when he had been to the house of one Babaji nayak with one Prahallad Palei to call him for thatching of a house. The deceased was daily labourer and only breadwinner of the family. While on the fateful morning; on 30. 3. 97 he set out of his house and proceeded on the village road to reach the house of Babaji Nayak without any premonition of the impending danger that awaited him there near house of Babaji Nayak on the road, his legs came in contact with snapped live electric wire which fell on the ground and he was instantaneously electrocuted. He fell down and died within no time. The village of the deceased coming under Kendrapara Police Station jurisdiction, F. I. R. was lodged in the same morning at 9;a. m. , u. D. case was registered, inquiry taken up, dead body was put to post-mortem examination and in the post-mortem report cause of death and injuries sustained was found to be accidental electrocution and burn injuries.
( 3 ) THE petitioners in this writ petition attribute the death of the deceased to the utter negligence of the management of the opposite parties Grid Corporation of Orissa ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation')and prayed for issuing direction to the opposite parties to compensate them to the tune of Rs. 2,00,000.
( 4 ) TO squirm out of the situation a counter affidavit has been filed by the opposite parties disclaiming the liabilities and it is pleaded therein that the circumstance under which the deceased Rabindra Nayak faced the accident was not due to laches or negligence on their part. It is pleaded that the electric wires drawn to light irrigation points run in the south-east corner of the house of Babaji Nayak and due to violent storm followed by heavy rain in the night electric wire snapped from the pole and fell on the homestead of said Babaji Nayak and while the deceased was going to call him he came in contact with the live wire and was electrocuted. It is also pleaded that transmission and distribution of electricity is regulated by Electricity Act, 1948 and the Rules framed thereunder and there is no provision in the said Act and Rules to guard the electric power distribution lines drawn in the remote areas and during premonsoon checking no defect was detected in the line and as such there was no negligence on the part of the opposite parties and since they have no control over the previous night storm and rain and the same being an act of God (vis major) no liability can be fastened on them to compensate the petitioners. Besides, the opposite parties have questioned the maintainability of this petition on the ground that on the face of controversial facts specifically as to the age and wage of the deceased proof of which is required to be rendered through evidence adduced on that score to determine compensation. The same cannot be adjudicated effectively in this writ petition which is heard and decided on affidavits of the parties only.
( 5 ) FROM the above pleadings we gather the following admitted position: it is admitted fact that the responsibility of the electric energy supply in the localiity where the accident occurred was statutorily conferred on the Corporation. It is furtber admitted position that the death of the deceased was due to electrocution on his unknowingly coming in contact with live electric wire that snapped from the pole and was lying on his path to the house; of babaji Nayak. It is also admitted that the voltage of electricity transmitted through the wires is potentially of dangerous tension and in the event of its snapping
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.