SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ori) 713

N.PRUSTY
AMIT TAUNK ALIAS AMIT KISHORE TAUNK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.DAS, B.H.MOHANTY, D.P.MOHANTY, R.K.Nayak, S.Barma, T.K.MOHANTY

( 1 ) THE petitioner has approached this Court challenging the order dated 20-9-2005 passed by the learned s. D. J. M. , Sadar, Cuttack in G. R. Case No. 1220 of 2005 rejecting an application under Section 457 of the code of Criminal Procedure for release of the seized cash in his favour.

( 2 ) THE factual backdrop of the petitioner's case is that he was working as a Salesman (Gumasta) under M/s. Sheth Bhagaban Das vithal Das and Sons, Nayasarak, Cuttack, and Nirmal Sheth Is the proprietor of the said Firm. As usual, on 5-8-2005 at about 12-30 p. m. he had gone to ICICI Bank, bajrakabatl Road, Cuttack, for depositing a sum of Rs. 25,00,000/- of the firm. While he was standing near the Cash counter of the Bank, some unknown persons snatched away his bag containing the entire amount of cash. The petitioner shouted and chased them. One of the accused persons, namely, rajendra Giri (accused No. 1) was caught hold of by the local public. The petitioner lodged FIR in Mangalabag Police Stations, on the basis of which Mangalabag P. S. Case no. 166 of 2005 was registered under Section 454,380 and 34, IPC. Accused Rajendra giri was arrested and he disclosed the names of other accused person










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top