SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Ori) 47

S.ACHARYA
BHAGABAN DEVATA – Appellant
Versus
MAHADEV DEVATA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK MOHANTY, B.K.PAL, B.S.MISHRA, D.BHUYAN, N.Prusty

S. ACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) THE unsuccessful objectors under Section 47, Civil Procedure Code in execution Case No. 131/69 against the auction sale of certain properties are the appellants in these appeals. All the three appeals arise out of the common judgment passed on three petitions under Section 47, Civil Procedure Code filed by the appellants in the court below; all the three appeals were heard analogously, one set of argument was advanced by counsel appearing for both the parties; and so all the three appeals are hereby being disposed of by this one judgment.

( 2 ) AUCTION sale in respect of certain properties' was held in the said execution proceeding on 27-6-1974. The appellants claim to be pendente lite purchasers of some of those properties. They did not prefer any petition under Order 21, rule 90, Civil Procedure Code but filed petitions under Section 47, Civil procedure Code challenging the validity of the auction sale mostly on the ground that the sale proclamation had not been made, and if made it was not in accordance with the procedure laid down for that purpose under the Civil procedure Code, and that the said sale was not held on the date when and by the court where i













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top