SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Ori) 13

S.N.SHANKAR, B.K.RAY
T. BHAGIRAO – Appellant
Versus
K. PANDURANGA SUBUDHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.PATRA, R.MOHANTY, Y.S.N.MURTY

SHANKAR, C. J.

( 1 ) CHALLENGE in this petition filed by the tenant is to Annexures 1 and 2. Annexure 1 is the order passed by the House Rent Controller in proceedings under the Orissa House Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act)granting a decree against the petitioner to deliver vacant possession of the suit house to O. P. No. 1 within two months. Annexure 2 is the order in appeal passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate on 8-9-75 confirming the order of eviction.

( 2 ) THE order of eviction was granted against the petitioner by the House Rent controller on the ground that the house in question was required in good faith by O. P. No. 1 for purposes of his profession and also that the same was bona fide required by him for remodelling to make it suitable for the aforesaid purpose. The learned appellate Court negatived the first ground, but agreed with the learned House Rent Controller that the house was required for remodelling and on this basis maintained the eviction order.

( 3 ) IT was strongly urged on behalf of the petitioner that mere remodelling of the house without the proof of any "requirement" by the landlord did not justify the grant of a decree








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top