SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Ori) 21

S.K.RAY, P.K.MOHANTY
NIRMALA BEN PATEL – Appellant
Versus
INDERSINGH BAGI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Laxmidhar Rath, R.N.SINHA, S.C.MOHAPATRA

MOHANTI, J.

( 1 ) CHALLENGE in this writ application is to the order of 'remand passed by the appellate authority under the Orissa House Rent Control Act, 1967.

( 2 ) THE petitioner filed an application under Section 7 (4) of the Orissa House rent Control Act for eviction of opposite party No. 1 from a house alleging that she required the same for her personal occupation. Opposite party No. 1 admitted that he was a monthly tenant under the petitioner in respect of the house in question, but contended that the petitioner did not require the house bona fide for her personal occupation. The case was posted to 19-10-74 for hearing, On that day opposite party No. 1 applied for adjournment which was rejected by the learned House Rent Controller and an order of eviction was passed ex parte. Opposite party No. 1 preferred an appeal before the Chief judicial Magistrate (opposite party No. 2) and prayed for remanding the case to the House Rent Controller for giving him an opportunity to put forth his case. After hearing the parties the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambalpur came to the findings that though the case was not covered by the provisions of Order 41, Rule 23, Civil Procedu


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top