JAGMOHAN REDDY, M.SESHACHALAPATI, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Radha Bai – Appellant
Versus
Banka Chinnayya – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision petition originally was heard by our learned Brother, Venkatesam, J. The scope and effect of Section 89 (2) of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) fell to be decided by him. In the arguments addressed before the learned Judge, various decisions of this Court were cited including two unreported Bench decisions, viz. , G. Veera Ready v. B. Venkayya, C. M. P. No. 5309 of 1960 in C. R. P. No. 2089 of 1957 (A. P.) and T. Shankaraiah v. Laxmamma, C. R. P. No. 1911 of 1963 (A. P. ). The first-decision was not brought to the notice of the Bench that decided the second case and also certain earlier decisions were pot brought to the notice of the Bench that decided the first case. The learned Judge though) that there was a conflict between the two unreported Bench decisions relating, to a matter of procedure and referred the revision petition to a Full Bench for disposal.
( 2 ) THE facts leading up to the filing of the present revision petition may be stated briefly: The revision petitioner, Radha Bai, is the landholder and pattadar of S. Nos. 205, 208, 209, 222 and 223 of Cho
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.