SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Ori) 43

R.N.MISRA, B.N.MISRA
STATE OF ORISSA – Appellant
Versus
CALCUTTA COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.Misra, R.C.PATNAIK

K. N. MISRA, C. J.

( 1 ) PLAINTIFF, a Company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act with its registered office at Calcutta, entered into a contract with the State of Orissa through its officers for supply of materials meant for use in construction of projects and/or buildings of the State. Mutual rights and obligations were stipulated in the contract. When the security furnished by the plaintiff was forfeited and penalty was levied against it on the plea of breach, it filed a suit on 23-8-1965 for declaration that the order of forfeiture and the levy of penalty were liable to be set aside and for a direction that the amounts withheld be paid to the plaintiff. The plaintiff pleaded that it was the obligation of the defendants to provide a motorable road to the siphon site where delivery and stacking of materials were to be made. The defendants were under obligation to provide the stacking site too. They having failed to perform their part of the contract, the plaintiff could not make the supply according to the time schedule though it was ready to fulfil its obligation. It was also contended that the levy of penalty was unconscionable and otherwise bad.

( 2 ) ALL the defenda

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top