SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Ori) 88

B.K.BEHERA
B. K. KUTTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.MOHANTY, B.K.Kutty, Indrajit Ray, K.PATNAIK, R.MOHANTY

B. K. BEHERA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant stool charged for commission of offences punishable under Section 512) read with Section 5 (1) (c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (for short, the Act) and Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, the Code) in the court of the Special Judge, Sambalpur, as follows: First-That you B. K. Kutty being a public servant i. e. in the capacity of a Steno to R. T. O. , Sundargarh in December, 1972, dishonestly or fraudulently misappropriated or converted to your own use a sum of Rs. 325/- by forging the R. C. Book of car No. O. R. D. 5328 and by putting a false R. C. No. 1034 dated 10-11-72, which sum was entrusted to you in the said capacity, which was under your control by one Kundanlal of old Station, Rourkela towards the tax of his said car and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act read with Section 5 (1) (c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, and within my cognizance. Second-That you B. K. Kutty during the same time and place, being the Steno to R. T. O. , Sundargarh, forged certain documents purporting to be a valuable security i. e. the R. C. Book of car No. O. R. O. 532


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top