SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ori) 33

K.P.MOHAPATRA
BAIKUNTHANATH MOHANTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajit Rath, P.K.MISHRA

K. P. MOHAPATRA, J.


( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the order passed by the Special Judge (Vigilance), Sambalpur convicting the appellant under S. 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (referred to as the 'act') and under S. 409, I. P. C. and sentencing him to imprisonment of various terms and fines of different amounts with a further direction that the sentences of imprisonment shall run concurrently.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the prosecution case are that the appellant was serving as the Revenue Inspector of Tora within Bargarh Sub-division in the months of July and August, 1975. During those months there was a special drive for collection of land revenue and water tax from tenants. The appellant as the Revenue Inspector of the area was in charge of collection thereof. On 26-7-1975 he collected a sum of Rs. 50/- and again on 27-7-1975 he collected a further sum of Rs. 400/- from Ramesh Chandra Sahu (P. W. 5) towards land revenue and water tax. In July 1975 he collected a sum of Rs. 800/- from Gourishankar Sahu (P. W. 8) towards royalty of a Sairat. On 23-8-1975, he collected Rs. 500/- towards land revenue and water tax from Madanmohan Sahu (P. W. 9 ). The appellant also













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top