SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ori) 79

D.M.PATNAIK, S.C.MOHAPATRA
DWIJA BHOI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK MOHANTY

PATHAK, C. J.

( 1 ) BOTH these writ applications arise out of an election under the Orissa Gram Panchayat Act, 1964 (Orissa Act 1 of 1965) (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') and the Orissa Gram Panchayat Election Rules, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the 'rules' ).

( 2 ) THE Election Officer, opposite party No. 3, by notice dt. 19-12-1983 invited nominations for election to the office of Ward Member for Wards Nos. 8 and 9 of the Balipada Gram Panchayat in the district of Puri. Dwija Bhoi, petitioner in O. J. C. No. 40/84, filed his nomination for election to the office of Ward Member for Ward No. 9 while Purnachandra Nanda, petitioner in O. J. C. No. 41/84 filed his nomination for election in respect of Ward No. 8 in Form No. IV under Rule 29 of the Rules. The Election Officer rejected their nominations on the ground that the petitioners did not mention their age in the declaration in Form No. IV. Form No. IV is quoted below :

FORM No. 4

(See Rule 29)

 

Nomination paper for election of sarpanch/naib-Sarpanch and Members of the. . . . . . . Grama Panchayat. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Name of the Grama Sasan. . . . . . Ward No. . . . . . .

Election to the. . .






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top