K.P.MOHAPATRA
TAFAZUL RAHMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent
K. P. MOHAPATRA, J.
( 1 ) IN this appeal challenge is to the Order passed by the learned Special Judge (Vigilance), Sambalpur convicting the appellant under Ss. 161,465 and 477-A of the Indian Penal Code ('i. P. C. ' for short) and under S. 5 (2) read with S. 5 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act') and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for each offence with a further direction that the sentences shall run concurrently.
( 2 ) THE prosecution case may be stated in brief. The appellant was a public servant employed as the Stenographer of the Superintending Engineer,p. W. D. (R and B), Sambalpur. P. W. 12 Manoranjan Patnaik was a Contractor who had submitted an application in the office of the Superintending Engineer for registration as a 'd' class Contractor. On 3-8-1976 he met the appellant and made a specific request for registration because, the appellant was dealing with such matters. The appellant told that a sum of Rs. 50/- would have to be deposited under challan as application fee and accordingly P. W. 12 gave a sum of Rs. 50/-to the appellant for the said purpose. He also gave another sum of Rs. 5/- to hi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.