High Court Of Orissa
R. C. PATNAIK, D. P. MOHAPATRA
BALASORE TALKIES (P) LTD - Appellant
Versus
BALASORE MUNICIPALITY - Respondent
ORIGINAL JURDN. CASE 1135 Of 1983
Decided On : 01/21/1986
OCTROI DUTY - CINEMATOGRAPHY FILMS - LEVY ON - VALIDITY - S. 131 (1) (KK) OF ORISSA MUNICIPAL ACT, 1950 - INTERPRETATION - FILMS BROUGHT FOR EXHIBITION IN CINEMA HALLS - WHETHER LIABLE TO OCTROI DUTY - HELD, YES.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioners, owners of cinema halls, challenged the levy of octroi duty on cinematography films brought by them for exhibition in cinema halls. The Municipal Councils concerned imposed octroi duty on the films brought by the petitioners under S. 131 (1) (kk) of the Orissa Municipal Act, 1950, after obtaining sanction from the State Government.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the petitioners were liable to pay octroi duty on the films brought by them into the municipal limits wherein their cinema halls were located, for exhibition therein.
Issues: Whether the provisions of S. 131 (1) (kk) of the Orissa Municipal Act, 1950, are attracted to import of cinematography films by the petitioners for exhibition in their cinema halls situated within the municipal limits.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court interpreted the term 'use' in S. 131 (1) (kk) of the Act and held that it is of wider connotation than 'consumption'. Any article that is put to some application suffers waste or deterioration to some extent, though not totally destroyed or used up and can be said to come within the purview of the word 'use' in S. 131 (1) (kk) of the Municipal Act for imposition of octroi duty. The Court also held that the films brought by the petitioners were used within the municipal limits and thereafter taken out therefrom, and hence, they were liable to octroi duty.
Final Decision: The writ petitions were dismissed.
D. P. MOHAPATRA, J.
( 1 ) THE petitioners in these five writ petitions challenge the levy of octroi duty on cinematography films brought by them for exhibition in cinema halls. The petitioners are owners of cinema halls situated in different towns in the State. They bring cinematography films from different distributors for exhibition in the cinema halls. The Municipal Council within the limits of which the cinema halls are located have imposed octroi duty on the films brought by the petitioners and owners of other cinema halls situated therein, at different rates. The Municipal Councils concerned in these writ petitions are those of Balasore and Berhampur. The imposition has been made in exercise of power under S. 131 (1) (kk) of the Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), after getting the requisite sanction from the State Government in the Housing and Urban Development Department as required under the Act. Since the material facts in all these writ petitions are not in dispute and the petitioners raise common questions of law the cases were heard together and shall be disposed of by this common order.
( 2 ) THE gist of the case made out by the petitioners in their writ applications, is that they get films from different distributors for exhibition in their cinema halls from time to time. Each film consists of several reels depending on length. In most of the cases the films that the petitioners get are old copies which have already been exhibited in cinema halls elsewhere in the country. According to the petitioners, under the agreement with the distributors the title in the goods (films) remains with the distributors and the petitioners pay either a certain percentage of the collection or a fixed amount as rental to the distributors for exhibition of the films in their cinema halls. On expiry of the period fixed under the agreement, the film is returned to the distributor without any change in its original form. On these facts, the petitioners contend that the provisions of S. 131 (1) (kk) of the Orissa Municipal Act are not attracted since the films are not brought inside the Municipal limits for 'sale' or 'consumption' or 'use'. As such, the action of the Municipal Council levying octroi duty on the films and that of the State Government according sanction for such levy are ultra vires the aforesaid provision of the statute and invalid and inoperative. The imposition and collection of octroi duty on the basis of such illegal action is also bad.
( 3 ) THE opposite parties, i. e. , the Municipal Councils concerned and the State Government in the Urban Land Development Department in their counter-affidavit have not contested the averments on facts in the foregoing para. They however, contend that under the arrangement between the distributors and the petitioners (exhibitors), though the latter might (not) have brought the films inside the municipal limits for sale or consumption, they have brought the said films for 'use'. As such, it is urged on behalf of the opposite parties that the condition precedent for imposition of octroi duty is satisfied and the petitioners are liable to pay the impost.
( 4 ) FROM the respective cases of the parties narrated above, the core question that arises for consideration is : whether the provisions of S. 131 (1) (kk) of the Act are attracted to import of cinematography films by the petitioners for exhibition in their cinema halls situated within the municipal limits of Balasore and Berhampur. Before proceeding further in the matter, it will be helpful to quote the provisions of S. 131 (1) (kk) of the Orissa Municipal Act. "s. 131 (1 ). The Municipal Council may, from time to time, at a meeting convened expressly for the purpose of which due notice shall have been given subject to the provisions of this Act impose within the limits of the municipality the following taxes and fees or any of them -xx xx xx (kk) an octroi on goods brought within the limits of mun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.