SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ori) 185

High Court Of Orissa
H. L. AGRAWAL, G. B. PATTANAIK
AMISHA NAGPAUL - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
O. J. C.  2586  Of  1986
Decided On : 11/26/1987

Advocates Appeared:
A.S.Naidu, B.K.NAYAK, B.K.PATNAIK, B.R.SARANGI, G.R.NAI, M.R.Panda, P.K.Panda, PRASANTA MOHANTY, R.C.ROUT, R.K.PRADHAN, R.K.RATH, S.C.Dash

Prescribing "Oriya" as a subject in the Entrance Test for admission to the M.B.B.S. Course was arbitrary and irrational, having no reasonable nexus with the object to be achieved, namely, the assessment of relative merit for the study of the M.B.B.S. Course.

Headnote:

MEDICAL EDUCATION - ENTRANCE TEST - ORIYA AS A SUBJECT - LEGALITY - INDIAN MEDICAL COUNCIL'S PRESCRIBED SUBJECTS - REASONABLE NEXUS WITH OBJECT - ASSESSMENT OF RELATIVE MERIT - RELEVANCE AND REASON - EQUALITY CLAUSE - ARTS. 14 AND 16 - CLASSIFICATION - REASONABLE DIFFERENTIA - REASONABLE RELATION TO OBJECT - COMPENSATORY STATE ACTION - ART. 29(2) - PROTECTION OF CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged the legality of the Prospectus prescribing "Oriya" as a subject in the Entrance Test for admission to the M.B.B.S. Course and further prescribing fifty percent of the marks in Oriya to be secured in order to be eligible for consideration for admission. The Indian Medical Council had prescribed Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and English as the subjects for the Entrance Test.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that prescribing "Oriya" as a subject in the Entrance Test for admission to the M.B.B.S. Course was arbitrary and irrational, having no reasonable nexus with the object to be achieved, namely, the assessment of relative merit for the study of the M.B.B.S. Course. The Court further held that the provision prescribing Oriya as a compulsory subject would be discriminatory in nature and offend the protection under Art. 29(2) of the Constitution.

Issues: 1. Whether prescribing "Oriya" as a subject in the Entrance Test for admission to the M.B.B.S. Course was arbitrary and irrational? 2. Whether the provision prescribing Oriya as a compulsory subject would be discriminatory in nature and offend the protection under Art. 29(2) of the Constitution?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the prescription of "Oriya" as a subject in the Entrance Test had no reasonable connection with the study of medical science and that the books, teaching, and examinations were all conducted in English. The Court further held that the object of holding an entrance examination was to assess the relative merit of the students seeking admission to the M.B.B.S. Course and that "Oriya" had no relevance to the study of medical science. 2. The Court held that the provision prescribing Oriya as a compulsory subject would be discriminatory in nature and offend the protection under Art. 29(2) of the Constitution, which confers an individual right to the citizens as such and protects their cultural and educational rights.

Final Decision: The Court struck down the provision in the prospectus prescribing "Oriya" as a subject at the Entrance Test and the provision requiring a candidate to secure not less than fifty percent marks in Oriya to qualify for selection. The Court directed that the results of the Entrance Test held for the academic session 1987-88 be declared excluding the marks obtained in Oriya.

G. B. PATNAIK, J.

( 1 ) IN this batch of writ petitions, the legality of the Prospectus prescribing "oriya" as a subject in the Entrance Test and further prescribing fifty per cent of the marks in Oriya to be secured in order to be eligible to be considered for admission to the M. B. B. S. Course is the point in issue. The petitioners in O. J. Cs. Nos. 2586, 2893, 3054, 3266 and 3537 of 1986 had appeared at the Entrance Test held for the academic session 1986-87 and petitioners in O. J. C. No. 2662 of 1987 have appeared at the Entrance Test that has been held during this year, but the results have not yet been declared. It is the common case of the petitioners in all these writ petitions that the admission to the M. B. B. S. Course in three different Colleges in the State as well as the M. B. B. S. Course in Government Medical Colleges including the Dental Wing of the S. C. B. Medical College is made through an Entrance Test. For that purpose every year a prospectus is issued. Para 8 of the Prospectus deals with the Entrance Examination. Para 8. 7 provides :-"there shall be one question paper in the Entrance Examination consisting of multiple choice objective type questions covering Physics, Chemistry and Biology (Botany and Zoology) and English taught at the qualifying examination level and another question paper with separate Answer sheet of Descriptive type in Oriya up to M. E. Standard. "it is asserted in the writ petition that the Indian Medical Council which exercises control over the medical studies throughout the country has prescribed the subjects in which tests should be held for entry into medical colleges and these subjects are Physics, Chemistry, Biology and English. Without any rhyme or reason, the State of Orissa has prescribed "oriya" as also a subject in the Entrance Test and such prescription is arbitrary having no reasonable nexus with the object to be achieved and accordingly requires to be struck down.

( 2 ) IN the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the opposite parties, a stand has been taken that the Indian Medical Council, no doubt, has recommended the subjects to be examined at the Entrance Examination for admission to the M. B. B. S. Course, but that does not take away the power of the State Government to prescribe any additional subject in which the Entrance Test may also be held. It has been further asserted that since Oriya has been declared as the official language of the State with effect from 1-4-1985 and it is the only spoken language of the people of the State, it is essential for every medical student to have dialogue with the patients to understand their problems and for that purpose, the Government thought it fit to have a test in Oriya also and accordingly such prescription cannot be held to be arbitrary or irrational.

( 3 ) THE short question which arises for consideration, therefore, is as to whether prescribing "oriya" as a subject in the Entrance Test for admission to the M. B. B. S. Course in the three medical colleges of the State obviously for assessing the individual merit can be said to have any reasonable nexus with the object to be achieved. It is too well known that in a State where there is more than one medical college and there is more than one University from which students usually obtain their minimum qualification for being entitled to be admitted to the M. B. B. S. Course, it is not possible to have their relative merits on the basis of the marks obtained by them in the University Examination, inasmuch as the standard of examination and valuation of answer papers varies from one University to the other. There cannot be a second opinion on the point that the admission to any institution must be made on the basis of merit. Since it is not possible to assess the relative merit of the students seeking admission on the basis of their respective marks obtained in the University examination as the standard of marking varies from University to University, the Indian Medical













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top