SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ori) 140

B.K.BEHERA, G.B.PATTANAIK
M/S. SASHIKANT AND CO. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.PASAYAT, B.PATNAIK, N.C.PANIGRAHI, S.P.MOHANTY

G. B. PATNAIK, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under S. 482 of the Cri. P. C. for quashing of the charges framed against the petitioners under Ss. 485, 486 and 487 of the I. P. C. (hereinafter referred to as the "code") and S. 16 (1) (a) (i) read with S. 7 (i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the "act" ).

( 2 ) WHEN this matter was heard by one of us, namely Hon'ble Justice B. K. Behera, several important questions having arisen for consideration and no direct decision either of the Supreme Court or of this Court being there on the points, it was directed that the case be placed before a larger Bench for disposal and that is how the matter has come before the Division Bench.

( 3 ) ON 5-8-1979, the godown premises of the petitioners was raided by Mangalabal Police people and several articles were seized. The seized articles were mustard oil. Vanaspati, coconut oil of different brands. After seizure, the Food Inspector of Cuttack Municipality drew two samples from mustard oil and palmoline oil and sent the same to the Public Analyst for analysis. The Public Analyst reported that the samples which had been sent for analysis were found to







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top