SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Ori) 114

HARI LAL AGRAWAL, R.C.PATNAIK, P.C.MISRA
BANABIHARI TRIPATHY – Appellant
Versus
REGISTRAR OF CO-OP. SOCIETIES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.PATNAIK, K.N.JENA, R.K.Patra, S.C.Dash

H. L. AGRAWAL, C. J.

( 1 ) WHEN this writ application was placed before a Division Bench of this Court, it referred the matter to a larger Bench to consider the following two questions :-" (1) Whether the Co-operative Societies registered under a Co-operative Societies Act as such will come within the fold of Art. 12 of the Constitution and are amenable to the writ jurisdiction of the High Court? (In case the answer is in the negative), (2) Whether the Co-operative Society is borne (born?) under any Statute or is discharging any such functions which may make it an 'instrumentality of the State' "? (Second question is recasted)

( 2 ) A few facts may also be noticed : the petitioner was appointed as a Clerk in the Khurda Central Co-operative Bank (for short 'bank') in the year 1958 and in due course was promoted to the post of Accountant in the year 1966. While working as such in the Head Office at Khurda, he was suspended and reverted to the post of Branch Manager, thus imposing a 'major penalty' by the office order of the Bank dated 4-11-1966 (Annexure-2) pending the contemplated departmental enquiry, and in the departmental enquiry, his services were terminated by order dated 10-
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top