G. B. PATTANAIK, J.

( 1 ) THESE two revisions were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment since common facts are involved. The complainant in I. C. C. 32/82 is the petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 55/84 assailing the Order of the learned Magistrate dated 26-9-1983 by which Order the Magistrate came to the conclusion that he had no jurisdiction to take cognisance under Section 467 I. P. C. in view of the bar provided under Section 195 (1) (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The accused persons are the petitioners in Criminal Revision No. 577/83 challenging the Order of the Magistrate dated 26-9-1983 holding the trial of the case against them for the offence under Section 406 I. P. C. to proceed.

( 2 ) THE short facts of the case are that the complainant filed a complaint petition alleging therein that the accused persons committed the offences under Section 406 as well as under Section 467 I. P. C. It was averred therein that the Aska Co-operative Central Bank had filed a dispute case being Dispute Case No. 732/78 against the father of the complainant as well as the present accused persons and also against the Service Co-operative Society for realisa