SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.M. SHELAT AND G.K. MITTER, JJ.
Thakur Jugal Kishore Sinha, Appellant
Versus
The Sitamarhi Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. and another, Respondents.
Criminal Appeal No.18 of 1965,
D/- 13-3-1967.
Advocates appeared
Mr. B. P. Singh, Advocate, for Appellant; Mr. D. Goburdhun, Advocate (for No. 1) and Mr. U. P. Singh, Advocate (for No.2), for Respondents.
-held, but High Court cannot take the case to itself or determine merely the question of law as to interpretation of Constitution arising in the case before the Tribunal.
-held, Art. 227 does not limit jurisdiction to hierarchy of Civil/Criminal Court under High Court who can correct errors of various kinds of Courts and tribunal under it in appropriate cases.
-held, it is not correct to hold that unless a case can be withdrawn from one Court to High Court for purposes mentioned in the Article, that Court would not be subordinate to High Court. The intention of Art. 228 is not so, but only intends to give power on High Court to withdraw a case from ordinary Court when question mentioned in the Article is involved, where in normal course also the decision of ordinary Court may be taken to High Court on appeal.
-see decision in Jugal Kishore v. Sitamarhi Central Co-operative Bank, AIR 1967 SC 1494=(1967) 2 SCWR 460=(1967) 2 SCA 428.
Judgment
MITTER, J. : This appeal by certificate granted by the High Court at Patna under Art. 134 (1) (c) of the Constitution is directed against the judgment and order of that Court, dated December 14, 1964 in Criminal Miscellaneous Appeal No. 6 of 1964 where by the appellant was found guilty of contempt of Court, i. e., of the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Sitamarhi Circle, exercising the powers of the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, under S.48 of the Bihar and Orissa Co-operative Societies Act, 1935.
2. The three questions which were argued before us in this appeal were:- (1) Whether the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies was a Court within the meaning of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1952; (2) Even if it was a Court, whether it was a Court subordinate to the Patna High Court ; and (3) whether the words used by the appellant in one of his grounds of appeal to the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, which formed the basis of the complaint, did amount to contempt of any Court.
3. The facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are as follows: The Sitamarhi Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. (formerly named as Sitamarhi Central Co-operative Union) was a society registered under the Bihar and Orissa Co-operative Societies Act, 1935, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The appellant was the elected Chairman of the Society and was in control of its entire affairs. The bank was engaged in carrying on a business inter alia in salt, sugar and kerosene oil. It was alleged that the appellant entrusted to one Suraj Banshi Choudhary the work of supplying coal for which purpose he was given an advance of Rupees 7,004-5-0 and that out of this amount a sum of Rs. 5,014-5-9 could not be realised from Suraj Banshi Choudhary. Thereafter, a surcharge proceeding under S. 40 of the Act was taken up before the Registrar of Co-operative Societies on December 22, 1953 when a sum of Rs. 14, 288-13-9 was held to be realisable from the appellant and another person. The appellant went in appeal to the State Government and by an order, dated March 28, 1957 the amount was reduced to Rs. 5,014-5-9. The bank was not made a party to the appeal before the State Government and it raised a dispute under S. 48 of the Act that the appellant was liable for the whole of the original amount of Rs. 14, 288-13-9 on the ground that the State Government s order being ex parte was not binding on it. This dispute went to the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies exercising powers of the Registrar under S.48 of the Act. On May 15, 1964, the Assistant Registrar decided the matter upholding the contention of the bank and making the appellant liable for the entire amount of Rs. 14,288-13-9. In the meantime, however, the appellant had challenged his liability for the amount of Rs. 5, 014-5-9 as determined in appeal by the State Government by a Writ Petition to the High Court of Patna which was dismissed. He then filed a title suit before the Subordinate Judge of Muzaffarpur who decreed it in his favour and at the time when the contempt matter was heard by the Patna High Court an appeal preferred by the bank from the said decree was pending before the District Judge, Muzaffarpur. The appellant preferred an appeal to the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies against the order of the Assistant Registrar who was made respondent No. 2 in the appeal. One of the grounds of appeal ran as follows:-
"For that the order of respondent No. 2 is mala fide inasmuch as after receiving the order of transfer he singled out this case out of so many for disposal before making over charge and used double standard in judging the charges against the defendants Nos. 1 and 2. It is prayed that it should be declared that the order of the Assistant Registrar is without jurisdiction, illegal and mala fide and heavy costs should be awarded making respondent No. 2 responsible mainly for such costs."
4. The bank filed an application in the Patna High Court on
Relied on : Thakur Jugal Kishore Sinha v. The Sitamarhi central Co-operative Bank Ltd.
Relied on. : Thakur Jugal Kishore Sinha, v. The Sitamarhi central Co-operative Bank Ltd. and another
Brajnandan Sinha v. Jyoti Narain
referred to : Virindar Kumar Satyawadi v. State of Punjab
referred to : Maqbool Hussain v. State of Bombay
referred to : Bharat Bank Ltd. v. Employees of Bharat Bank Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.