G.B.PATTANAIK, LINGARAJA RATH
DOLAGOVINDA SETHI – Appellant
Versus
KANIKA MUSEUM – Respondent
L. RATH. J.
( 1 ) THESE two applications under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seek quashing of the orders passed by the Tribunal constituted under S. 57-A of the Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960 (Act 16 of 1960) declaring the Kanika Museum and the Rajendranarayan Botanical Garden, the opposite party No. 1 respectively in each of the cases, as charitable trusts of public nature with Raja Sailendranarayan Bhanja Deo as the trustee under S. 2 (24) (e) of the said Act and the properties claimed under each of the respective trusts as trust properties. So far as O. J. C. No. 150/81 is concerned, the facts are that an application was filed by the opposite party No. 1 through Raja Sailendranarayan Bhanja Deo, since substituted by opposite parties 1 (a) to 1 (c), before the Tribunal-cum-Subordinate Judge seeking declaration as trustee-holder of a religious/charitable trust of a public nature. In an accompanying statement to the application giving short history of the creation of the trust, the opposite party No. 1 contended that the applicant Sailendranarayan Bhanja Deo and his father late Rajendranarayan Bhanja Deo being very much interested in studying the various intellectu
Income Tax Special Purposes Commr. v. Pemsel
REFERRED TO : Radhakanta Deb v. The Commr. of Hindu Religious Endowments, Orissa
Bihar State Board of Religious Trust v. Mahanth Sri Biseshwar Das
State of Madras v. Subramaniaswami Mahimai Paripalana Sangam
Royal Choral Society v. Inland Revenue Commrs.
Loka Shikshana Trust v. I.T. Commr. Mysore
Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales v. Attorney General
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.