G.B.PATTANAIK
MANAGING DIRECTOR – Appellant
Versus
NATABAR MOHANTY – Respondent
G. B. PATTANAIK, J.
( 1 ) THE short question which arises for consideration in this revision is whether a co-operative society can be construed to be an authority controlled by the State Government within the ambit of S. 41a of the Arbitration Act, 1940, which was introduced by way of amendment by Orissa Act 3 of 1983, so that if a dispute arises where such society is a party to the dispute then the reference is to be made to the Arbitration Tribunal in accordance with the said provision of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (for short 'the Act' ).
( 2 ) OPPOSITE part No. 1 is a contractor and had entered into an agreement with the petitioners for construction of some factory buildings in the spinning mills of the petitioners at Tora in the district of Sambalpur. In respect of execution of the said work, dispute arose and opposite party No. 1 wanted that the matter should be referred to an arbitrator invoking the arbitration clause in the agreement. Petitioner No. 1 was of the view that the arbitration can be made only by the Tribunal under S. 41a of the Act and not by anybody else. Opposite party No. 1, however, nominated one Superintending Engineer, who is opposite party No. 2, as the Ar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.