SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Ori) 130

B.S.CHAUHAN, B.N.MAHAPATRA
UTTAM PRASAD GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
ORISSA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates: A.K.Nath, A.K.PANDA, A.K.RATH, S.K.Sarangi, S.L.PATNAIK

JUDGMENT

B. S. CHAUHAN, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed for a direction quashing the order dated 10-3-2004 (Annex.-l) of the orissa State Financial Corporation (hereinafter called 'the Corporation') intimating the petitioner that due to non-payment of the dues, the physical possession of the mortgaged hypothecated assets of Hotel Puja at Koida had been taken under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 (hereinafter called 'the Act') on 2-3-2004; and also for quashing sale notice dated 13-1-2005 (Annex.-8 ).

( 2 ) THE facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that the petitioner had taken a loan of Rs. 8 lakhs in the year 1999. The loan agreement was executed on 28-4-1999 by mortgaging the property in dispute as financial security. The petitioner, Shri Uttam Prasad gupta along with Smt. Chinmayee Gupta and miss Rita Gupta also executed personal guarantee bond to the Corporation. Petitioner availed loan, however, did not pay the instalments. Therefore, the opposite party-Corporation cancelled the undisbursed loan vide letter dated 24-1-2004. Due to non-payment of Corporations dues, the demand notice dated 24-1-2004 was issued to the petitione

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top