SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Ori) 148

L.MOHAPATRA, B.K.PATEL
Manoj Kumar Tripathy – Appellant
Versus
Mayarani Praharaj – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.K. Patel, J.

1. Aggrieved by dismissal of his application for dissolution of marriage by decree of divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) of Hindu Marriage Act (for short 'the Act') in Civil Proceeding No. 198 of 1999 by Learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack, husband-Appellant has preferred this appeal against wife-Respondent.

2. Parties are Hindus. Appellant is a native of village Bodar in the district of Cuttack. Their marriage was solemnized in Danda Bibha form on 5.1.1998. Appellant is a doctor employed under the State Government whereas Respondent is working as Senior Technical Assistant in the Department of Architect under O.U.A.T., Bhubaneswar. Appellant's father was a Government servant & working as a Health Educator prior to his retirement. It is also not disputed that parties are living in separation since 2.10.1998.

3. It is asserted by the Appellant that his marriage with Respondent was solemnized in village Bodar. After the marriage the parties resided in village Bodar till the 5th day of the marriage, & thereafter shifted to Bhubaneswar. It is alleged by the Appellant that Respondent is an adamant & rowdy lady, who has no respect or affection towards her in-laws. She


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top