SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Ori) 183

2002 (II) OLR — 25
THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND A. S. NAIDU J.
Dr. Dillip Kumar Das and others(In OJC No. 12568/2001)
Dr. Gudla Siva Prasad and others(In OJC No. 13755/2001)
Dr. Nanda Kishore Sahoo and others(In OJC No. 13722/2001)... Petitioners
Versus
State of Orissa and others... Opp. Parties
O.J.C. Nos. 12568, 13755 and 13722 of 2001.
Decided on 13th May, 2002.

Advocates:
For Petitioner:Mr. Jagannath Patnaik, Senior Advocate and M/s. A. A. Das, R. Rath, B. Mohanty, T. K. Patnaik, S. Das, P. K. Nayak and S. Patnayak (In OJC No. 12568/2001)
M/s R. K. Dash, R. C. Mohapatra and B. K. Jena (In OJC No. 13755/2001)
M/s S. K. Pattanaik,
U. C. Mohanty and R. Ray
(In OJC No. 13722/2001)
For Opp. Parties :Additional Government Advocate (for opp. party Nos. 1 to 5 in OJC No. 12568/2001, opp. party Nos. 1 to 3 in OJC No. 13755/2001 and opp. party Nos. 1 to 4 in OJC No. 13722/2001)
M/s G. Mukherji, P. Mukherji, S.Patnaik, M. K. Mazumdar, A. C. Panda and A. Pradhan (for opp. party No. 6 in OJC No. 12568/2001)
M/s R. C. Mohanty, T. Mishra, and Miss B. K. Misra (for opp. party No. 7 in OJC No. 12568/2001, opp. party No. 6 in OJC No. 13722/2001, and opp. party No. 4 in OJC No. 13755/2001)

Headnote:ADMISSION TO POST-GRADUATE (MEDICAL) COURSES, 2002 — Resolution and decision of Health and Family Welfare Department by Resolution dated 31.8.2001 — Petitioners are "in-service" candidates for common entrance examination for Post Graduate (Medical) courses — Government decision that they are not able to join the entrance examination as "in-service" candidates — This was challenged — Details stated — After discussing decisions on the matter the Hon’ble Court held that provision for admission to Post-Graduate (Medical) courses for "in-service" candidates without compelling them to take entrance examination is violative of Art. 14 of Constitution of India — Restriction for them confining to their respective Universities is not based on any intelligible differentia and application of Regulations of Universities discussed — Provisions struck down — Directions given. (Paras 1 to 19)

JUDGMENT

P. K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, CJ. — These writ petitions challenge the decision taken by the Health and Family Welfare Department of the Govern¬ment of Orissa in the form of a Resolution dated 31.8.2001 and the Prospectus for admission to Post-Graduate (Medical) Courses, 2002 in the Government Medical Colleges of Orissa, though in O.J.C. Nos. 13722 of 2001 and 13755 of 2001 the prayer is con¬fined to the quashing of the Resolution. The petitioners in these writ petitions are described as “in-service” candidates in the sense that they are serving under the Govern¬ment of Orissa either in the Government Hospitals or in Orissa Government Undertakings. By Annexure-1 Resolution, the Government decided that the common entrance examination which was being conducted for all candidates aspiring to join the Post-Graduate (Medical) Courses should not be insisted upon for the “in-service” candidates since according to the State, the in-service candidates were not able to fill the quota of seats set apart for them by competing in the entrance examination. According to the Government, this resulted in the seats set apart for them revert¬ing to general candidates who were writing the entrance examina¬tion and to ensure availability of Doctors for rural services in the State, it was necessary to devise a means of ensuring seats for the in-service candidates and the method to achieve it was to dispense with the necessity for entrance examination for those in-service candidates. It was this decision of the Government that was carried forward in the Prospectus. We shall now refer to the relevant clauses of the Prospectus.

2. Clause 4 of the Prospectus enumerates the seats avail¬able for the Post-Graduate (Medical) Courses in the three Govern¬ment Medical Colleges of Orissa. The total number of seats avail¬able is shown to be 183. Ninety-four seats are set apart for in-service candidates including those reserved for Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes and the Physically Handicapped. Eighty-nine seats are set apart for admission direct by way of entrance examination, inclusive of the seats reserved for Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes, Physically Handicapped and the descendants of defence personnel.

Clause 5 lays down the eligibility criteria of the candi¬dates.

Clause 6 deals with category of candidates. Clause 6.1 says that an eligible candidate would be treated as in-service who at the time of application is in the employment of Government of Orissa or Undertakings of Government of Orissa, and who, by 31.3.2002 would complete not less than three years of service in undivided Koraput-Balangir-Kalahandi districts and districts of Boudh, Gajapati, Kandhamal or not less than five years in rural areas or not less than seven years of service in all other areas. It is also provided that in-service doctors who at the time of application are in employment of the Government of Orissa or Undertakings of the Government of Orissa and had only rendered two years of service in undivided Koraput-Balangir-Kalahandi districts including Kandhamal, Gajapati and Boudh or four years in rural areas are six years in other areas are eligible to appear in the entrance examination as direct candidates meaning that they were eligible to take the Entrance Examination.

3. It is provided in Clause 6.3 that doctors working under the State Government/Government of Orissa Undertakings not coming under Clauses 6.1 and 6.2 will not be eligible to appear either as an in-service or as a direct candidate. In other words, doctors in service who have not put in the period of service as referred to in Clause 6 would not be entitled to compete for admission at all to the Post-Graduate (Medical) Courses. But as per Clause 6.4, a candidate who fulfils the criteria of in-service candidate, if so desires, can apply as a direct candidate forgoing his/her claim as an in-service candidate by a declara¬tion as per Appendix No. V. The declaration is to the effect that the person at pre



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top