I.MAHANTY, L.MOHAPATRA
Rabinarayan Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Forest Range Officer of Soroda Range – Respondent
JUDGMENT
I. MAHANTY, J. — The petitioner-Rabinarayan Sahu in this writ application has sought to challenge an order of confiscation dated 19.4.2007 passed by the Authorized Officer-cum-District Forest Officer, Southern Division, Ghumusar, Bhanjanagar (O.P.3) as well as the judgment dated 24.9.2007 delivered by the learned District Judge, Ganjam-Gajapati, Berhampur in F.A.O. No.18 of 2007 confirming the aforesaid order of confiscation of the peti¬tioner’s Tractor bearing Registration No.OR-07-K 9335 along with a trolley bearing Registration No.OR-07-K 9336.
2. The main contention advanced by Mr. Das, learned coun¬sel appearing for the petitioner is that the confiscation pro¬ceeding as well as the appellate order stand vitiated since the statutory enquiry contemplated under Rule-4 of the Orissa Forest (Detection, Enquiry and Disposal of Forest Offence) Rules, 1980 (in short “1980 Rules”) has not been complied with. Rule 4 of Orissa Forest (D.E.D. of F.O.) Rules, 1980 reads as follows :
“4. Enquiry - (1) When a forest offence is detected, a preliminary enquiry, may be held by a Forester in charge of the section who shall forward his enquiry report along with the report in Form No.1 t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.