I.MAHANTY
A. Sanyasi Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
ORDER
8.4.2010 — Heard Mr. J.K. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. V. Narsingh learned A.G.A. for the State.
The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioners, namely, A Sanyasi Rao and K. Narasimha Murty with a prayer to quash the order dated 12.10.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Malkangiri in C.T. No.1 of 2009, by which order the learned Addl.Sessions Judge came to reject the petitioners appli¬cation for bail under Section 167(2), Cr.P.C inter alia, on the ground that charge sheet had been filed on 8.10.2009 and there¬fore although application under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. has been filed by the accused-petitioners on 6.10.2009, the same was no more available for consideration due to submission of charge sheet on 8.10.2009 during the pendency of the petitioners appli¬cation for consideration of bail under Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C.
Mr. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Uday Mohanlala Acharya v. State of Maharashtra, reported in AIR 2001 SC 1910 : 2001 (II) OLR (SC) 290, by way of majority judgment rendered by Hon’ble Justice
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.