SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Ori) 89

I.MAHANTY
Ganga @ Gangadhar Sethy – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates:
For Petitioner:M/s. M. Kanungo, S. Das & P.R. Singh
For Opp. Party:Additional Government Advocate

JUDGMENT

I. MAHANTY, J. — This application under Section-482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner-Ganga @ Gangadhar Sethy seeking to challenge the order dated 02.01.2009 passed by the learned J.M.F.C., Aska in G.R. Case No. 114 of 2008, whereby, a petition filed by the accused-petitioner claiming to be a juvenile as on the date of occurrence came to be rejected.

2.It appears from the case record that an F.I.R. was registered on 28.3.2008 for alleged commission of offence under Sections 302, 307, 326, 109, 120-B.I.P.C. read with Sections 25(1-B) (a) & 27 of the Arms Act. In course of investigation, the present petitioner along with other accused persons were arrested and forwarded to the judicial custody. The present accused-petitioner filed a petition before the learned J.M.F.C., Aska on 26.06.2008 claiming therein that his date of birth is 12.05.1991 and as such prayed to be declared as a ‘juvenile’ and to be provided with the benefits under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. This petition came to be rejected by order dated 02.01.2009, which is the subject matter of challenge in the present proceeding.

3.Mr. M. Kanungo, learned counsel for the accus






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top