SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Ori) 2

V.GOPALA GOWDA, B.N.MAHAPATRA
Orissa Public Service Commission – Appellant
Versus
Orissa Information Commission, Bhubaneswar – Respondent


ORDER

02.01.2012 - Heard Mr. Bijaya Kumar Dash, learned counsel for the petitioner-OPSC and Mr. B. Rath, learned counsel on behalf of O.P. No.1 and Mr. Bhuyan learned counsel on behalf O.P. No.2.

2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-Orissa Public Service Commission (OPSC), Cuttack questioning the correctness of the impugned order dated 08.04.2008 passed by the State Chief Information Commissioner, Orissa Information Commission (hereinafter called the 'SCIC') in Second Appeal No.349 of 2007 under Annexure-6 wherein the SCIC while allowing the Second Appeal filed by the present O.P. No.2, directed the petitioner to provide the information as sought for under the RTI Act, 2005 by the O.P. No.2 within 30 days by speed post after blanking out relevant portions indicated in paragraph-5 of the said order and report compliance thereof.

3. The fact situation giving rise to this writ petition in nutshell is that O.P. No.2 had made an application in prescribed format under Section 6(1) of the R.T.I. Act, 2005 read with Rule 4(1) of the R.T.I. Rules 2005 for supply of photocopies of his Answer Sheets of English Paper-I & II, Arithmetic, General Knowledge, Intelligence test of Ju















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top