SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Ori) 48

NARASIMHAM
MAHABIR PRASAD AGARWALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
J K Mohanty, R K Das, S Acharya

Judgment

Narasimham, C J

[1] This is a petition in revision to quash proceeding under Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code pending against the petitioners in the Court of a 1st class Magistrate of Boudh on the ground that the entire proceeding was initiated without jurisdiction.

[2] On 14-12-55 one Ramgopal Seth gave a written report at Manmunda police station in Boudh sub-division to the effect that some gold ornaments and cash were stolen from his house. The local police at first recorded merely a station-diary entry but on 16-12-55 they instituted a regular F. I. R. and took up the investigation of the case. After completing investigation a Final Report was submitted on 8-2-56 to the effect that though there was some suspicion against the petitioner Mahatair Prasad Agarwala the evidence was insufficient for submitting charge-sheet against him.

The Final Report appears to have been received in the Sub divisional Magistrate's office on 13-12-56 but there was some delay in its being put up before the Subdivisional Magistrate. On 18-2-56, however, the informant Ramgopal Seth filed a protest petition before the same Magistrate alleging that police had not investigated the case properl













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top