SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Ori) 69

NARASIMHAM, G.C.DAS
Dhirendranath Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates:
Srinivas Misra, for Petitioner; Advocate-General, for Opposite Party.

Judgement

R. L. NARASIMHAM, C. J. :-

This is an application under Art. 226 of the Constitution by a Grade I Upper Division Assistant of the commerce Department of the Orissa Secretariat, against the order of the Government of Orissa No. 8307-Com, dated 3-9-1955, dismissing him from service.

2. On 27-11-1953, the Government of Orissa placed the petitioner under suspension and referred his case to the Tribunal constituted under the Disciplinary Proceedings (Administrative Tribunal) Rules 1951, in consequence of a report submitted by the Superintendent of Police, Enforcement, after confidential enquiry, to the effect that the petitioner and some other members of the ministerial staff of the commerce department had manipulated the figures in the Receipts Register so as to justify an increase in the staff.

The sole member of the Administrative Tribunal Shri P. K. Kapila, framed specific charges against the petitioner, called upon him to submit his explanation, and held a regular enquiry under the said rules. The enquiry appears to have been held in conformity with the principles of equity and natural justice, the witnesses were examined in his presence, and he was given an opportunity to cr
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top