GHULAM HASAN, T. L. VENKATARAMA AYYAR, S. R. DASS, M. C. MAHAJAN, N. H. BHAGWATI
Shree Meenakshi Mills LTD. , Madurai – Appellant
Versus
A. V. Visvanatha Sastri – Respondent
Judgement
MAHAJAN C.J.I. : Writ Petitions Nos. 330 to 333 of 1954. though presented by different persons, raise identical questions for consideration and decision and can be conveniently disposed of by one judgment.
2. In April 1947 Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947, Act 30 of 1947 was passed by the Central Legislature. By S. 3 of the Act the Central Government was empowered to constitute an Income-tax Investigation Commission for investigating matters relating to taxation on income with particular reference to the question whether the existing law was adequate for preventing the evasion thereof. Section 5(1) of the Act further empowered the Central Government to make a reference by the 30th June, 1948 to the Commission for investigation and report of any cases wherein it had prima facie reason for believing that a person had, to a substantial extent , evaded payment of taxation on income. The date for making the reference was subsequently extended to 1st of September, 1948.
By an Amendment Act passed in 1948 it was provided that the life of the Commission, in the first instance, would be up to the 31st of March, 1950, but that it could be further extended to
Followed : Keshavan Madhava Menon v. The State of Bombay
Lachmandas Kewalram and another v. State of Bombay Habeeb Mohammed
Habeeb Mohamed-Patitioner v. The State of Hyderabad
Suraj Mali Mohta and Co., v. A. V. Visvanatha Sastri and another
Messrs. Trojan and Co., v. RM. N.N. Nagappa Chettiar
SYED QASIM RAZVI v. THE STATE OF HYDERABAD AND OTHERS(and other cases)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.