I.MAHANTY, BISWANATH MAHAPATRA
Narayan Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
INDRAJIT MAHANTY, J.
1. The present batch of writ applications has come to be filed by the petitioner Charidesa Krusak Surakhya Sangha and several land losers seeking to challenge the validity of the acquisition of land made by the Industrial Development Corporation of Odisha (hereinafter referred to as the IDCO) for the purpose of setting up a thermal power plant by M/s. KVK Nilachal Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the KVK).
2. At the commencement of hearing, we requested the learned counsel for the respective parties in this batch of cases to make out categories on the issues raised and to bunch the various cases in each such category. Accordingly, on the consent of the learned counsel representing the various parties, four categories were made. This judgment relates to issues under Categories - II & III as noted herein-below:–
Category - II & III
Challenge to the alienation of Government land under the OGLS Act, illegal sale of Government land, illegal sale of SC & ST, Smashan, common land.
Challenge to the validity of Notification u/s. 73(c) of the Odisha Land Reforms Act, 1960 as well as challenge to the private purchases made by KVK for its thermal power plant.
8
R.S. Sherawat vs. State of Haryana & Others
Jaipal Singh vs. State of Punjab
K.T. Plantation Private Limited and Another vs. State of Karnataka
Bhatnagars & Co. Ltd. vs. Union of India
Janamohan Das & Others vs. State of Orissa & Others
Consumer Action vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Murudeswara Ceramics Ltd. and Another vs. State of Karnataka and others
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education vs. Paritosh Bhupeshkumar Sheth
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.